SpyderProxy vs WebShare is the comparison most budget residential-proxy shoppers face in 2026. Both providers start at roughly the same price point per GB, both advertise residential pools, and both target the small-team and solo-scraper market. But beneath the matching price tags the two products diverge sharply: SpyderProxy ships SOCKS5 on every plan and exposes a 130M+ premium pool with sticky sessions up to 24 hours, while WebShare gates SOCKS5 to higher tiers and runs a meaningfully smaller aggregated residential pool with shorter session persistence. This 2026 head-to-head unpacks the real differences so you can pick the right provider for your workload.
This guide is based exclusively on the publicly visible WebShare product pages and SpyderProxy product pages as of April 2026. Where WebShare's public site does not disclose a number, we say so explicitly rather than inventing one.
SpyderProxy is the better pick for any workload that needs SOCKS5, long sticky sessions, or a large premium residential pool — price-per-GB is competitive and every feature is in the base tier. WebShare is a fit only if you need the absolute cheapest per-GB rate and do not need SOCKS5, city targeting, or premium-pool trust scores.
SpyderProxy is a proxy-service provider headquartered outside the US jurisdiction with residential, datacenter, ISP (static residential), and 4G/5G mobile products. The core value proposition is pay-as-you-go pricing starting at $1.75/GB, a 130M+ premium residential pool with sticky sessions up to 24 hours, 195+ country coverage with city-level targeting, SOCKS5 on every plan at no additional cost, and direct support via Telegram and email.
SpyderProxy's product range in 2026: Budget Residential ($1.75/GB, 10M+ IPs), Premium Residential ($2.75/GB, 130M+ IPs), Static Residential (ISP) ($3.90/day), Static Datacenter ($1.50/proxy/month), and LTE Mobile ($2/IP).
WebShare is a US-based proxy provider that launched in 2018 targeting the low-end and hobbyist market. WebShare's original product was free rotating datacenter proxies (still available, limited to ~10 proxies per free account). Over time they added paid datacenter tiers, a residential product ("Residential Basic" / "Residential"), and a static ISP product. WebShare's brand recognition in the budget segment is strong — they are often the first result for "cheap residential proxy" searches — and their pricing page is one of the most visited in the proxy market.
WebShare's feature set is narrower than SpyderProxy's: no LTE mobile product, SOCKS5 gated behind specific plans rather than universal, no city-level targeting on the cheapest residential tier, and country coverage that is respectable but not class-leading. WebShare compensates by aggressive pricing and brand volume.
The headline number most shoppers compare is $/GB for rotating residential. SpyderProxy and WebShare are close at entry level but diverge sharply on feature inclusions.
| Dimension | SpyderProxy | WebShare |
|---|---|---|
| Rotating Residential (entry) | $1.75/GB (Budget) | ~$1.40-$2.30/GB (Residential plans, tiered by volume) |
| Rotating Residential (premium) | $2.75/GB (130M+ pool) | Single tier; no dedicated premium pool |
| Residential Pool Size | 10M+ (Budget), 130M+ (Premium) | 30M+ advertised aggregated pool |
| SOCKS5 Support | Included on every plan, port 7778 | Available on select plans, not universal |
| City-Level Targeting | Yes, all residential and mobile plans, included | Country-level on entry; city targeting on higher tiers |
| Sticky Session Length | Up to 24 hours | Typically shorter (minutes to hours) |
| Static Residential (ISP) | $3.90/day per IP, 31+ countries | Static ISP available, per-IP monthly pricing |
| Static Datacenter | $1.50/proxy/month, unlimited bandwidth | From ~$0.60/proxy/month, bandwidth caps apply on cheapest tiers |
| LTE Mobile | $2/IP, 150+ countries | Not offered |
| Free Trial | Pay-as-you-go, low minimum top-up | Free tier (10 datacenter proxies) |
WebShare's entry residential can be marginally cheaper per-GB than SpyderProxy's Budget Residential when you commit to higher volumes. But per-feature, SpyderProxy includes SOCKS5 and city targeting in the base tier, which WebShare charges extra for or only exposes on higher plans. For SOCKS5 users specifically, SpyderProxy's effective cost is lower.
Pool size matters because larger pools give fresher IPs per request and make rotation less detectable to rate-limit systems that track IPs per /24 block. Raw counts are marketing-heavy across the industry — both providers publicly claim pool sizes, but aggregation methodology differs.
SpyderProxy publishes 10M+ IPs on Budget Residential and 130M+ IPs on Premium Residential. The Premium pool is sourced from tier-1 residential providers and is the pool to use against DataDome, Cloudflare, and Kasada. WebShare's residential pool is publicly advertised in the tens of millions range, aggregated across upstream partners.
Real-world quality matters more than headline count. SpyderProxy's Premium Residential consistently posts higher success rates on bot-defended targets (Amazon, Mercari, Instacart, StockX) than any aggregated budget pool, because the Premium tier filters for tier-1 residential ASNs rather than reselling whatever IPs are cheapest that week. WebShare Residential is better suited to tier-2 scraping (public SERPs, simple e-commerce, non-WAF APIs) where any clean consumer IP works.
SOCKS5 is a common sticking point. SpyderProxy exposes SOCKS5 on every residential and static plan at no extra cost — the same username/password works on port 7778. This matters for Telegram bots, torrent clients, many scraping frameworks (Scrapy with scrapy-proxy-pool, Colly in Go), and any tool that only supports SOCKS5 as the proxy protocol.
WebShare's SOCKS5 availability depends on the plan. Historically WebShare has offered SOCKS5 on select plans and as an add-on, not uniformly across every tier. Users who specifically need SOCKS5 should confirm on the current WebShare pricing page before signing up, because plan structures have changed multiple times.
For any workload that requires SOCKS5 — particularly Telegram/WhatsApp bots, torrent traffic, or scraper frameworks that do not support HTTP CONNECT tunneling — SpyderProxy is the safer default.
Sticky sessions keep the same IP across multiple requests — critical for workflows that require session state (cart, login, multi-step forms). SpyderProxy Premium Residential supports sticky sessions up to 24 hours per session token, specified in the username (USER-session-abc123-lifetime-1440). Budget Residential supports shorter sticky sessions for lower-volume workloads.
WebShare's sticky session duration on residential is typically shorter (minutes to a few hours, depending on plan). For long-running account work (Amazon seller dashboards, Mercari selling flows, Ticketmaster queues that can run hours), SpyderProxy's 24-hour stick is a material advantage. For short-scrape workflows that finish in under 10 minutes, the difference is immaterial.
SpyderProxy advertises 195+ countries on Budget Residential and Premium Residential, with city-level targeting in major metros (Tokyo, Berlin, London, Paris, Madrid, New York, Los Angeles, São Paulo, Mumbai, etc.) on all residential and mobile plans at no upcharge. Target by appending geo flags to the username: USER-country-DE-city-berlin.
WebShare's country coverage is broad but the cheapest residential tier historically exposes country-level targeting only; city-level targeting is a paid upgrade or reserved for higher tiers. For anyone doing region-specific ad verification or local-pack SEO work, SpyderProxy's built-in city targeting is a functional advantage that removes the need to pay upgrades.
SpyderProxy offers direct Telegram support (fast, async, human in the loop) plus email. Billing is pay-as-you-go with low-minimum top-ups — no monthly commit required, no auto-renew traps. WebShare runs web-ticket support plus email with a larger support team but slower async turnaround. Billing is subscription-based with monthly auto-renew, which some users prefer for predictability and others dislike for commit rigidity.
For scrapers doing burst workloads (scrape a few GB, pause, scrape again next month), SpyderProxy's pay-as-you-go is more capital-efficient. For predictable month-over-month usage, WebShare's monthly tiers may be slightly cheaper in absolute terms.
Raw pool size rarely matches real-world success rates. Below is how the two providers behave against common tier-1 targets, based on community benchmarks and operator experience. Exact success rates vary week to week as upstream pools rotate; these are directional.
The directional read: WebShare Residential is adequate for tier-2 targets and high-volume lightweight scraping. SpyderProxy Premium Residential is the safer pick for tier-1 bot-defended targets and any workflow where sticky sessions or mobile trust matter.
SpyderProxy operates on pay-as-you-go: top up $5, $10, $50, or any amount, use the credit at $1.75/GB or $2.75/GB until depleted. Credits do not expire on short timelines and there is no auto-renew. For bursty workflows — scrape a client's site for a week, then nothing for a month — this is capital-efficient because you pay only for what you use.
WebShare operates on monthly subscription tiers. Each tier includes a monthly bandwidth allocation; unused GB does not roll over. Auto-renew is the default. For steady workflows that burn a predictable monthly allocation, the subscription model can be marginally cheaper than equivalent pay-as-you-go spend. For bursty workflows, the subscription model wastes unused GB every month.
A practical consequence: if your monthly usage is variable (say, 5 GB some months and 80 GB in others), SpyderProxy's pay-as-you-go bills you for exactly what you use. WebShare would either charge you for unused capacity in light months or hit you with overages in heavy months. Match the billing model to your real usage pattern.
For a broader comparison landscape, see our SpyderProxy vs Smartproxy guide (note: Smartproxy rebranded to Decodo in 2024 — see our SpyderProxy vs Decodo guide for the current name). Our best proxies for web scraping guide ranks providers by anti-bot success rate. See also SOCKS5 vs HTTP proxies and static residential proxies explained.
At high residential volumes, WebShare's per-GB rate can edge below SpyderProxy's Budget Residential $1.75/GB on some committed tiers. At entry volumes and when SOCKS5 or city targeting is included, SpyderProxy is competitive or cheaper effective cost because those features are bundled rather than paid upgrades.
Yes. WebShare offers rotating residential proxies alongside their original datacenter and static ISP products. The residential pool is publicly advertised in the tens of millions, aggregated across upstream partners. WebShare's residential works well for tier-2 scraping but is not a premium pool for DataDome/Kasada-defended targets.
SpyderProxy Premium Residential ($2.75/GB) is better for scraping Cloudflare, DataDome, Kasada, and similarly defended sites due to the 130M+ tier-1 residential pool. For tier-2 public-site scraping at scale, both work and price per GB is close. SpyderProxy wins when SOCKS5 or city targeting matters.
WebShare's plan structure gates SOCKS5 to specific tiers rather than including it universally — historically this was positioned as a premium protocol option. SpyderProxy takes the opposite approach and ships SOCKS5 on every plan at no upcharge via port 7778.
SpyderProxy does not offer a permanent free tier of 10 proxies like WebShare does, but uses pay-as-you-go billing with low-minimum top-ups, so a small test spend ($5-10) covers a meaningful trial run. WebShare's free 10 datacenter proxies remain the easiest way to prototype without spending money.
No. WebShare does not offer a 4G/5G LTE mobile product as of 2026. SpyderProxy offers LTE Mobile at $2/IP across 150+ countries, including major carriers like Verizon, T-Mobile, Vodafone, Deutsche Telekom, NTT Docomo, and SoftBank.
Yes. SpyderProxy is a common switch target for WebShare users who need SOCKS5 universally, longer sticky sessions (up to 24 hours), a larger premium residential pool (130M+ IPs), LTE mobile, or city-level targeting without upgrade fees. Price per GB is competitive at entry tiers.
SpyderProxy offers direct Telegram support for fast async human responses plus email. WebShare runs web-ticket and email support with a larger team but slower response windows. For scrapers who value real-time response on blocking issues, Telegram is a meaningful quality-of-life difference.
SpyderProxy vs WebShare comes down to what you actually use. If you need SOCKS5, long sticky sessions, city-level targeting, LTE mobile, or a premium residential pool that clears DataDome and Kasada, SpyderProxy is the better pick — and price per GB is competitive at entry tiers. If your only requirement is the absolute cheapest per-GB rate on committed monthly volumes and none of the premium features matter, WebShare is a fit.
Start a SpyderProxy residential plan at $1.75/GB (Budget) or $2.75/GB (Premium) with SOCKS5, city targeting, and 24-hour sticky sessions included.
