Back to Blog
Apr 24, 2026SpyderProxy vs Decodo is the 2026 version of the SpyderProxy vs Smartproxy comparison. Decodo is the 2024 rebrand of Smartproxy — same company, same product line, same Lithuanian operator, new name and new domain (decodo.com). The rename was driven by a trademark dispute with Bright Data over the word "Smart" in proxy-service branding, and it is the reason you see "Smartproxy" and "Decodo" appearing interchangeably across 2024-2026 comparison content. This guide compares SpyderProxy and Decodo on the metrics that actually matter in 2026: pricing, residential pool size, sticky sessions, mobile/ISP offerings, and support.
Everything below is based on publicly visible Decodo and SpyderProxy product pages as of April 2026. Where Decodo's public pricing varies by plan tier, we note the range rather than pick one number.
Decodo is a mature, Tier-1 aggregator with a large residential pool, enterprise features, and polished documentation — the correct pick when you need enterprise-grade billing, a dedicated account manager, and SOC2-style compliance on paper. SpyderProxy is a leaner pay-as-you-go alternative at roughly 40-60% lower per-GB entry pricing, with SOCKS5 on every plan, LTE mobile included, and 24-hour sticky sessions. For most scrapers, solo operators, and small teams, SpyderProxy's $1.75/GB Budget Residential and $2.75/GB Premium Residential are the better value. Enterprise buyers with committed seven-figure proxy spend and dedicated-AM requirements may prefer Decodo's procurement model.
Smartproxy was founded in 2018 in Vilnius, Lithuania, and built a strong residential-proxy brand through content marketing and affiliate programs. In 2024, Bright Data (the largest proxy provider globally, based in Israel) pursued trademark enforcement against multiple smaller providers using "Smart" in their branding. Smartproxy rebranded to Decodo mid-2024 as part of the settlement. The company, team, infrastructure, pool, and customer accounts are unchanged — only the brand name and the domain (smartproxy.com → decodo.com) were affected.
For buyers this matters because (a) older comparison articles and reviews still reference "Smartproxy" when discussing the current product, and (b) Decodo inherited Smartproxy's entire feature set, pool, and pricing model on day one. If you have read a review of Smartproxy from 2023, the product behaviour is essentially identical in 2026 under the Decodo name. The only substantive product change across the rebrand was updated pricing tiers in late 2024 and a refreshed dashboard.
For SEO and cross-reference, we also maintain a dedicated SpyderProxy vs Smartproxy guide which covers the same product line under its previous name.
SpyderProxy is a pay-as-you-go proxy-service provider with residential, datacenter, ISP (static residential), and 4G/5G mobile products. Pricing starts at $1.75/GB for Budget Residential and $2.75/GB for Premium Residential (130M+ IPs). Static Residential is $3.90/day per IP, Static Datacenter is $1.50/proxy/month, and LTE Mobile is $2/IP. SOCKS5 is included on every plan. Support is direct Telegram plus email. There is no monthly commit and no auto-renew.
Decodo (ex-Smartproxy) is a Lithuanian proxy provider with residential, mobile, ISP (static residential), datacenter, and site-unblocker products. The residential pool is publicly advertised at 115M+ IPs with 195+ country coverage and city-level targeting. Mobile pool covers 10M+ IPs across major carriers. Pricing starts around $2.50-$3.00/GB on entry residential plans for small volumes, dropping to $1.50-$1.80/GB on committed enterprise tiers. Static ISP proxies are available at per-IP monthly pricing. Decodo runs a full dashboard, API, statistics, and sub-user management, and is positioned squarely at the mid-market and enterprise segments.
Headline prices diverge at entry volumes and converge at committed volumes. SpyderProxy's advantage is deepest at the entry tier; Decodo closes the gap when you commit to higher monthly volumes with annual discounts.
| Dimension | SpyderProxy | Decodo (ex-Smartproxy) |
|---|---|---|
| Rotating Residential (entry) | $1.75/GB (Budget) | ~$2.50-$3.00/GB entry plans |
| Rotating Residential (premium) | $2.75/GB (130M+ pool) | Same pool; enterprise tiers drop to ~$1.50-$1.80/GB on commit |
| Residential Pool Size | 10M+ (Budget), 130M+ (Premium) | 115M+ advertised |
| SOCKS5 Support | Included on every plan | Supported on residential and ISP |
| City / State Targeting | Included, all residential and mobile plans | Included, city-level on residential |
| Sticky Session Length | Up to 24 hours | Up to 30 minutes rotating, 24h on some plans |
| Static Residential (ISP) | $3.90/day per IP, 31+ countries, unlimited traffic | ~$1.60/IP/month entry tier |
| Static Datacenter | $1.50/proxy/month, unlimited bandwidth | From ~$0.46/IP/month depending on volume |
| 4G/5G LTE Mobile | $2/IP, 150+ countries | Mobile proxy product with per-GB pricing |
| Billing Model | Pay-as-you-go, no auto-renew | Monthly subscription, auto-renew |
| Support | Telegram + email | Live chat, email, dedicated AM on enterprise |
The practical takeaway: SpyderProxy wins on entry-tier $/GB and on simplicity (pay-as-you-go, SOCKS5 bundled, 24-hour stick). Decodo wins on enterprise features (dashboard depth, sub-users, dedicated AM, compliance paperwork) and on committed-volume pricing at seven-figure annual spend.
Decodo and SpyderProxy Premium Residential draw from comparable tier-1 upstream partners, so real-world success rates on bot-defended targets are within a few percentage points of each other. Both clear Cloudflare default protections, both handle DataDome with curl_cffi + warmed sessions, both struggle with Kasada and Mercari-class defense without additional engineering. The marginal differences come down to: (a) pool freshness per country, which varies week to week based on upstream churn; (b) sticky-session honoring, where SpyderProxy's 24-hour ceiling beats Decodo on long-running account work; and (c) API limits on concurrent requests, which are generally higher on SpyderProxy at entry tiers.
SpyderProxy Premium Residential supports sticky sessions up to 24 hours via the lifetime-1440 username flag. Decodo's sticky session ceiling is plan-dependent — the standard ceiling is 30 minutes on entry residential plans, extending to 24 hours on enterprise tiers. For workloads requiring multi-hour account persistence (Amazon seller dashboards, Ticketmaster queue camping, long-form account-health monitoring), SpyderProxy's 24-hour stick in the base tier removes a common friction.
Both providers offer LTE mobile and Static Residential (ISP). SpyderProxy's LTE Mobile is priced at $2/IP and covers 150+ countries; Decodo's mobile product uses per-GB pricing on top of a base pool. For multi-account operators who value predictable per-IP pricing, SpyderProxy's flat $2/IP model is simpler.
On Static Residential (ISP), Decodo's per-month pricing can be cheaper at volume, but SpyderProxy's per-day model at $3.90/day includes unlimited traffic with no bandwidth caps — useful for IP-heavy workflows that burn many GB per IP per day (streaming, long-form dashboards, Mercari seller flows).
Decodo runs a subscription model with monthly auto-renew. Plans bucket by included traffic per month; unused GB does not roll over. This is predictable for steady workloads but inflexible for burst usage. SpyderProxy runs pay-as-you-go with no monthly commit and no auto-renew — top up when you need GB, it stays on the account until used. For scrapers with bursty workloads (a big scrape this month, nothing next month), pay-as-you-go is materially more capital-efficient.
Pool size headline numbers tell you little about real-world success rates. Both Decodo and SpyderProxy clear Cloudflare default protections at high rates, and both handle DataDome-protected targets with appropriate TLS (curl_cffi or equivalent) plus warmed session state. The interesting differences show up on the long tail of targets.
On Amazon product pages (low-to-moderate defense), both providers score above 95% success on the first request with a random residential IP. On Mercari Japan (DataDome + custom bot defense), both drop to the 70-80% range without session warming, and both climb back above 90% with a 10-minute warmed cookie session. On Kasada-defended targets (Ticketmaster non-queue pages, some Shopify fronts), both struggle without additional engineering — this is not a proxy problem, it is a client-side-challenge-solving problem that residential IP alone does not fix.
Where the providers diverge is on the trust of the specific upstream partners they aggregate. Decodo's pool has been in the market longer and is widely fingerprinted by some defensive vendors (meaning anti-bot systems have learned to score Decodo's known /16s lower than unknown residential IPs). SpyderProxy's Premium pool draws from newer upstream partnerships, which have less exposure to ranking penalties. This is subtle and changes week-to-week as upstream inventory rotates; for any high-value workload, run a 48-hour A/B test against your target before committing to either provider.
Decodo inherited Smartproxy's developer tooling, which is among the most mature in the residential-proxy market. The dashboard exposes per-sub-user traffic reports, hourly/daily breakdowns, geo-specific success graphs, and an API for programmatic user creation and credit allocation. Enterprise plans include a dedicated account manager, Slack-connect support, and SOC2-style compliance documentation.
SpyderProxy's dashboard is leaner. It covers the essentials: balance, top-up, traffic usage, current session tokens, per-country breakdowns. The API covers programmatic balance checks and basic reporting. There is no sub-user system at the dashboard level — if you need per-team billing, you provision separate SpyderProxy accounts. For enterprise-heavy operators who value per-sub-user API billing inside a single tenant, Decodo's dashboard is a meaningful advantage. For solo operators and small teams, SpyderProxy's simpler surface is often preferable.
Decodo runs live-chat support from a Vilnius-based team during extended business hours, plus 24/7 email ticketing. Response windows are typically under an hour during chat hours and under 8 hours on email overnight. Enterprise plans get dedicated AM with Slack-connect and SLA-backed response windows.
SpyderProxy offers direct Telegram support and email. Telegram response times are typically minutes for common issues (auth errors, IP rotation questions, geo-targeting syntax) and under an hour for anything requiring engineering. This is faster than Decodo's median for straightforward issues but does not include a formal SLA. For scrapers mid-incident who need a human to unblock them in minutes, Telegram support is a material quality-of-life difference. For procurement-driven buyers who need SLA paper, Decodo is the correct fit.
For the same product line under its previous name, see our SpyderProxy vs Smartproxy guide. For the WebShare comparison on the budget tier, see SpyderProxy vs WebShare. For a broader scraping-stack view see best proxies for web scraping, how to bypass Cloudflare, and static residential proxies explained.
Yes. Decodo is the 2024 rebrand of Smartproxy — same Lithuanian company, same team, same residential pool, same product line, same customer accounts. Only the brand name and domain (smartproxy.com → decodo.com) changed. The rebrand was the result of a trademark settlement with Bright Data over the word "Smart" in proxy branding.
Bright Data pursued trademark enforcement in 2023-2024 against multiple smaller proxy providers using "Smart" in their branding. Smartproxy agreed to rebrand to Decodo as part of the settlement mid-2024. The product, pool, and company remain unchanged; only the name and domain changed.
Not at entry tiers. SpyderProxy Budget Residential is $1.75/GB and Premium is $2.75/GB. Decodo's entry residential plans run ~$2.50-$3.00/GB. At committed enterprise volumes with annual prepay, Decodo drops to roughly $1.50-$1.80/GB, which can undercut SpyderProxy Premium — but only at seven-figure spend scales.
Both sit in the same upstream tier. SpyderProxy Premium Residential advertises 130M+ IPs; Decodo advertises 115M+ IPs. Real-world pool quality is comparable on bot-defended targets because both draw from similar tier-1 upstream partners. Pool freshness per country varies week to week.
Yes, Decodo supports SOCKS5 on residential and ISP products. SpyderProxy includes SOCKS5 on every plan at no additional cost, including Budget Residential, Premium Residential, Static Residential, Static Datacenter, and LTE Mobile.
SpyderProxy Premium Residential supports sticky sessions up to 24 hours via the username flag. Decodo's sticky session ceiling is plan-dependent — 30 minutes on entry residential tiers, extending to 24 hours on enterprise tiers.
Yes. Decodo offers a mobile proxy product with per-GB pricing on top of a base pool. SpyderProxy offers LTE Mobile at a flat $2/IP across 150+ countries. For multi-account operators needing predictable per-IP cost, SpyderProxy's model is simpler.
Yes. SpyderProxy is a common switch target for Decodo users who want pay-as-you-go billing (no monthly commit), SOCKS5 on every plan, longer sticky sessions in the base tier, or flat per-IP LTE mobile pricing. Price per GB is significantly lower at entry tiers; Decodo retains advantages at committed enterprise scale.
SpyderProxy vs Decodo comes down to usage profile and buying sophistication. SpyderProxy wins for the solo scraper, small team, or mid-market operator who values $1.75/GB entry pricing, pay-as-you-go billing, bundled SOCKS5, and 24-hour stick in the base tier. Decodo wins for the enterprise buyer with committed seven-figure annual proxy spend, procurement paperwork requirements, and dedicated-AM expectations. The rebrand from Smartproxy does not change the product — just the name you search for.
Start with SpyderProxy residential at $1.75/GB (Budget) or $2.75/GB (Premium) with SOCKS5, city targeting, and 24-hour sticky sessions included — no commit, no auto-renew.